27 February, 2015 AsiaNews.it Twitter AsiaNews.it Facebook            

Help AsiaNews | About us | P.I.M.E. | | RssNewsletter | Mobile





mediazioni e arbitrati, risoluzione alternativa delle controversie e servizi di mediazione e arbitrato
e-mail this to a friend printable version


» 06/07/2007
HONG KONG - CHINA
Wu Bangguo: Hong Kong’s autonomy laid down by Beijing
The head of the Chinese Parliament denies the city’s autonomy from Beijing and that the judicial and executive powers can be independent from political powers. Hong Kong politicians and experts counter that Basic Law does not exclude their full autonomy.

Beijing (AsiaNews/Agencies) – However much power the central government decides to assign to Hong Kong, this is what the Hong Kong gets. Wu Bangguo, The head of the National People's Congress, China’s Parliament, has recalled the limits – according to Beijing – of the city’s autonomy.

Article 20 of the Basic Law, which provides a legal basis for dealing with subsequent assignment of power by Beijing and also comprises the possibility of free and democratic elections, has often been cited by Hong Kong as a justification for the assignment of increased autonomy. Wu told a forum to mark the 10th anniversary of the implementation of the Basic Law – in the presence of Hong Kong Executive Chief Donald Tsang Yam-kuen - that “there was no question of the city being entitled to "residual power"”. China – he continued – has one single government and the “high degree of autonomy” enjoyed by Hong Kong is not a specific attribute of the SAR [special administrative region] but comes directly from Beijing. Wu insisted the chief executive must play a "dominant role" in the establishment and operation of the SAR government. He said it would not be appropriate to copy the separation of powers between the executive, legislature and judiciary or the parliamentary system from abroad.

Experts maintain that Wu, without making any explicit references, wanted to warn the city not seek political solutions which undermine the “absolute power” of Beijing, also because this summer Hong Kong’s political reform is due to be voted on and Basic Law provides for the setting up of universal suffrage by 2008.  

Political scientist Ma Ngok of Chinese University in Hong Kong told the South China Morning Post that “The message is clear. All powers come from Beijing and it has the ultimate say on `yes' or `no' on everything”.

For over ten years, since the ex British colony was returned to Chinese rule, Hong Kong has sought greater independence and the adoption of democratic elections.  The judiciary has remained independent of political power.

Liberal Party chairman James Tien Pei-chun, responds that said while the principle of separation of powers was not spelled out in the Basic Law, he believed it was part of the "one country, two systems" and "high degree of autonomy" package. Ma agrees pointing out that generally states in a federal system, through a written constitution, would hand over specific powers to the federal government.

But Beijing is against this interpretation of the law.  Already in 2004 Qiao Xiaoyang, undersecretary to the general committee of the National People’s Assembly, said that China had a central government that holds all power and that the local authorities only had powers delegated to them from Beijing.

 


e-mail this to a friend printable version

See also
03/17/2007 HONG KONG
March for Democracy, a small sign of dissent
by Dominic Yung
10/17/2014 HONG KONG - CHINA
As police clear Mong Kok, expectations and doubts about the talks with the government persist
06/05/2007 HONG KONG - CHINA
Over 55 thousand hold vigil in memory of Tiananmen victims
06/18/2010 HONG KONG – CHINA
Donald Tsang (and China) loses TV debate on democracy
by James Wang
12/13/2007 HONG KONG - CHINA
Donald Tsang in Beijing: universal suffrage for 2012; no, rather 2017

Editor's choices
EGYPT - ISLAM
What Tayeb and Sisi said is big step towards a revolution in Islam
by Samir Khalil SamirThe grand imam of Al-Azhar slammed literalist interpretations of the Qur'an and the Sunnah, as fundamentalists and Islamic terrorists do. He supports the urgent need for Islam's reform, especially in terms of teaching lay people and clerics. He also calls for an end to mutual excommunication (takfir) between Sunnis and Shias. Egyptian President al-Sisi chose to fight the Islamic state group after it beheaded 21 Coptic Christians, whom he called "Egyptian citizens" with full rights.
SAUDI ARABIA - ISLAM
For head of Al-Azhar, religious education reform is needed to stop Islamic extremismFor Ahmed al-Tayeb, it is urgent to come up with new educational programmes to avoid "corrupt interpretations" of the Qur'an and Sunnah. Islamic terrorism undermines the unity of the Muslim world. He blames Mideast tensions on a "new global colonialism allied to world Zionism". a speech by the Saudi king is read at the conference.
HONG KONG - CHINA - VATICAN
It looks like someone is trying to shout us down
by Card. Joseph Zen Ze-kiunThe widespread optimism concerning the dialogue between the Holy See and China is largely groundless. Some Chinese bishops unable to speak freely are asked "leading" questions. The key issues remain unresolved, namely episcopal appointments and the fate of the Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association. Benedict XVI's Letter to Chinese Catholics, also cited by Pope Francis, provides guidelines. No agreement is better than a bad agreement. What happened to Msgr. Cosma Shi Enxiang and Msgr. James Su Zhimin? Hong Kong's bishop emeritus, champion of religious freedom in China, delivers a vibrant reflection.

Dossier

by Giulio Aleni / (a cura di) Gianni Criveller
pp. 176
Copyright © 2003 AsiaNews C.F. 00889190153 All rights reserved. Content on this site is made available for personal, non-commercial use only. You may not reproduce, republish, sell or otherwise distribute the content or any modified or altered versions of it without the express written permission of the editor. Photos on AsiaNews.it are largely taken from the internet and thus considered to be in the public domain. Anyone contrary to their publication need only contact the editorial office which will immediately proceed to remove the photos.