The two were sentenced to the death in 2016 for shoving a Christian couple into a brick kiln because of false charges of blasphemy against them. “We request the honourable Supreme Court to check the pressures of the extremists in the case of Shama and Shahzad,” says activist.
Lahore (AsiaNews) – The High Lahore Court has acquitted two men accused of lynching and burning alive Shahzad and Shama Masih, a poor Christian couple they believed to be guilty of blasphemy.
In 2016, the Lahore Anti-Terrorism Tribunal had sentenced the two to death, along with three other people, in connection with the double murder. The High Court confirmed the death sentence of the other three.
"The murder did not take place secretly in some remote area of the country. The whole village was present,” says Hamza Arshad, educator and journalist. “There were many witnesses. Although someone did not participate, everyone knew, including the police."
Those acquitted are Muhammad Hanif and preacher Hafiz Ishtiaq; the other three are Mehdi Khan, Riaz Kambo and Irfan Shakoor. In March 2018 the same court freed another 20 accused, giving them the benefit of the doubt.
The religiously-motivated double murder took place in 2014. The couple was stoned and thrown alive into the brick kiln where Shahzad worked. The incident began on 4 November 2014 when a mob of 400 people attacked the two after they were accused of blasphemy.
In fact, the charge of insulting Islam was an act of revenge by Christian labourer’s Muslim employer over an unpaid debt. At the time of the attack, his wife was pregnant with their fifth child.
"We live in a country where a High Court judge is forced to flee after sentencing the killer of the governor” of Punjab, Salman Taseer, Hamza Arshad explains. Although "The release of Asia Bibi is good news, yet events show the power of extremists,” but “The state had to show its power”.
In his view, the outcome of the Masih case “may be due to poor prosecution or blindness of justice” vis-à-vis “marginalised communities”.
For Naveed Walter, president of Human Rights Focus Pakistan, "it is shocking that five years have passed and justice has not been given to the victims’ family”. Sadly, “several cases regarding minorities are still pending from years in courts.”
"It is well known that in the cases where minorities are victimised the process of justice becomes prolonged due to the influence of religious groups on judges”. In the end, “delaying of justice is actually an encouragement of culprits”.
Samson Salamat, president of Rwadari Tehreek, an Interfaith Movement for Tolerance, notes that "The acquittal of two of of five defendants is a disappointment for already terrified religious minorities, and this forces them to believe that justice will not be served in the case of the other three accused.”
“Rwadari Tehreek is concerned that the justice system will fail to provide relief to minorities in cases of attacks against their lives, places of worship and other properties.” In light of this, “We request the honourable Supreme Court to check the pressures of the extremists in the case of Shama and Shahzad because this kind of pressure has been visible in many similar cases.”