26 May, 2012 AsiaNews.it Twitter AsiaNews.it Facebook         

Help AsiaNews | About us | P.I.M.E. | | Newsletter




Voli Low Cost Roma
Voli Milano




mediazioni e arbitrati, risoluzione alternativa delle controversie e servizi di mediazione e arbitrato

e-mail this to a friend printable version


» 12/24/2011 13:46
TURKEY – EUROPEAN UNION
Tensions between Ankara and Paris over the Armenian question
by NAT da Polis
The French National Assembly has adopted a draft bill that would impose jail time and fines on anyone who denies the Armenian genocide. Erdogan’s government withdraws its ambassador in Paris and accuses France of genocide. Military cooperation is suspended and an economic boycott is a possibility. Istanbul’s Armenians and the Armenian Patriarchate are cool at the French move. Turkey’s entry into the European Union gets a bit harder.

Istanbul (AsiaNews) – Franco-Turkish relations have never been easy under President Nicolas Sarkozy. This time, the issue is not the legitimacy of Turkey’s place in Europe, but rather the genocide perpetrated by the Ottoman Empire in 1915 against the Armenians, an action never acknowledged by the secularist state founded by Kemal Ataturk or by today’s neo-Ottomanist government under Erdogan.

The spark that set off the controversy is a bill before the French National Assembly that would criminalise denying the Armenian holocaust with up to a year in prison and a fine of 45,000 Euros. France had already recognised the Armenian genocide in 2001.

In his statements, Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan was dour and bombastic, accusing France of being discriminatory, racist and xenophobic. Angry, the prime minister said that France’s “step will open heavy wounds that will be difficult to heal”. Instead, the French should look at their own genocides in Algeria and Rwanda.

Before the bill was adopted, thousands of Turks gathered in front of the French parliament to protest. As a first response, Erdogan recalled the Turkish ambassador in Paris for consultations. He also suspended military cooperation with France, cancelled military agreements with Paris, froze bilateral deals and suspended political and economic contacts between the two countries.

Measured and conventional, French Foreign Minister Alain Juppé urged Ankara to remain calm and not overreact. “We have lots of things to work on together,” he said. The draft bill is expected to be go before the French Senate in February 2012 ahead of France’s presidential elections. Back in May of this year, the Senate had refused to criminalise genocide denial.

In Turkey, reactions reflect the clichés usually associated with Erdogan and his ruling party, the AKP, closely following the official version of events, which backs Ottoman wartime policies and claims, whereby what happened in 1915 was sad but inevitable.

Various meetings and protests have also been organised by academic and commercial groups in Paris. In Turkey, the bill has allowed Erdogan to rally opposition parties, CHP and MJP, against France.

In Istanbul, the local Armenian community, especially people close to the newspaper Agos, which was edited by Hrant Dink until 2007 when he was murdered by Turkish ultra-nationalists, think that the French bill is a disaster for freedom of thought. For them, what counts is the “human aspect of the genocide”.

The Armenian Patriarchate in Istanbul issued a press release, seen by many as deceitful and full of religious sentiments. Armenian journalist, Mark Yesayan thinks that it might have been made on the request of people in high places.

Turkey’s liberal and leftwing circles view the French law as a foolish move by Sarkozy to win the Armenian vote in the upcoming presidential elections.

They note that the attempt by the Turkish government to criticise France in the name of freedom of thought is inappropriate given Turkey’s own shortcomings in the matter. For them, Erdogan’s reference to Algerian and Rwanda cannot legitimise Turkey’s official position. Sadly, they believe the country lacks the maturity and courage, at an individual and collective level, to face its own history.

Turkish analysts believe the French Senate will approve the bill and that the European Court of Human Rights will uphold it because it does not violate European law.

Significantly, diplomatic circles in Brussels see a connection between statements by Turkey’s Minister for EU Affairs Egemen Bağış, a possible boycott of French products, and the recent crisis between the European Union and Great Britain.

Great Britain’s isolation in the European Union will hinder, not help Turkey’s EU membership bid. London has always been a keen supporter of Ankara.

e-mail this to a friend printable version

See also
12/16/2004 Turkey – EUROPEAN UNION
Brussels to decide Turkish bid to join EU
02/29/2012 FRANCE - TURKEY
French Constitutional Council rejects law on Armenian Genocide
10/13/2006 TURKEY
Turkey protest: France's Armenian genocide denial bill leads to calls for boycott
01/24/2012 TURKEY-FRANCE
Turkey threatens retaliation against France over Armenian genocide law
09/08/2004 TURKEY - EUROPEAN UNION
EU Commissioner says Turkey's entry will end European integration

Editor's choices
VATICAN - CHINA
"Porta Fidei": the Pope's Apostolic Letter for the Year of Faith now in ChineseA tool to renew the "joy" and " enthusiasm of our encounter with Christ", written shortly before the World Day of Prayer for the Church in China (May 24). The Day and "Porta Fidei" emphasize the importance of understanding the faith and to witness it in public, in unity with the pope.
VATICAN
Pope calls on Chinese Catholics to be faithful to Church and consistent in their faithAt the Regina Caeli, Benedict XVI says that with the ascension, Jesus "has separated from us." A remembrance for victims of attack on Brindisi school and the earthquake in Emilia. An encouragement for the pro-life movement.
CHINA
Chen Guangcheng and Beijing's failure to reform
by Willy Wo-Lap LamIndividuals activists are not China's real challenge, social stability and keeping the Communist Party in power are. Chinese leaders run the risk however of losing control of the huge, expensive and ever-expanding security apparatus they are building. As illustrated by the Bo Xilai case, this could lead to unexpected and disastrous consequences. Here is the analysis of one of the foremost experts of modern China.

Dossier
by Gheddo P. Fazzini G.
pp. 336
by Buono Giuseppe, Pelosi Patrizia
pp. 432
by Giulio Aleni / (a cura di) Gianni Criveller
pp. 176
by Lazzarotto Angelo S.
pp. 528
by Bernardo Cervellera
pp. 240
Copyright © 2003 AsiaNews C.F. 00889190153 All rights reserved. Content on this site is made available for personal, non-commercial use only. You may not reproduce, republish, sell or otherwise distribute the content or any modified or altered versions of it without the express written permission of the editor. Photos on AsiaNews.it are largely taken from the internet and thus considered to be in the public domain. Anyone contrary to their publication need only contact the editorial office which will immediately proceed to remove the photos.