Conflict escalates between the Church and the government in Armenia

Archbishop Galstanyan is not just haranguing the crowds, but urging them to storm the palaces of power. According to many, Patriarch Karekin II himself is behind the escalation, denouncing the "continuous policy of unilateral surrender" in relations with Azerbaijan. Prime Minister Pašinyan, on the other hand, calls the bishops "agents provocateurs" who want to lead to war "as in the days of Byzantium".

by Stefano Caprio

Yerevan (AsiaNews) - The Armenian Apostolic Church has now taken an explicit political stance of confrontation with the government in Yerevan, with the risk of an increasingly violent radicalisation of the street protests, led by the Archbishop of Tavowš, Bagrat Galstanyan, who continues to repeat that "we will not leave the streets until victory is achieved", that is, until Prime Minister Nikol Pašinyan resigns.

Galstanyan does not just harangue the crowds, but urges them to storm the palaces of power, as has happened in the past few days, trying to lock up the premier and deputies in the National Assembly building in order to force them to appear before the 'people's court' he presides over.

The police began to use strong-arm tactics to disperse the demonstrators, although so far the revolutionary archbishop has not been touched. However, Pašinyan and the supporters of the ruling majority are using increasingly fiery arguments against their ecclesiastical opponents.

According to many statements by members of the Civil Accord party, the patriarch of the Armenian Church himself, the katholikos Karekin II, together with the entire ecclesiastical leadership of the 'Sacred Ečmjadzin', the historic patriarchal seat on the outskirts of Yerevan, is behind the bishop and the escalation of demonstrations.

It is precisely in this religious-administrative centre that the Higher Spiritual Council, the synodal body of the katholikos, meets almost in permanent session. It has issued a statement by the bishops expressing explicit support for the "popular opposition", while distancing themselves from the most violent actions of recent days, in which no members of the clergy are said to have participated.

The text denounced the "continuous policy of unilateral ceding of national territories, justified by demarcation agreements", which has provoked a wave of indignation and concern "both at home and in the diaspora, generating the mistrust that today leads to calls for the prime minister's resignation".

Pašinyan responds to these accusations by lashing out at 'all those who are using the Artsakh refugees for their own mercantile interests', provoking unrest in the streets. To Galstanyan who challenged him to take to the streets, the prime minister responded with a very emotional speech in parliament:

'Of course we meet, do you think the prime minister of Armenia has a problem talking to anyone? If I thought it would be useful to meet the bishop, I would have already had him loaded onto a police van'.

The prime minister directly accused Karekin II of having 'blessed' the riots and clashes with the police, which provoked outraged responses from the bishops, 'we condemn the attempts of the men in power to shift the responsibility for the people's protests onto the Church... instead, they try to justify their own anti-clerical behaviour, as has happened recently on several occasions'. The reference is to the 'Sardaparat' memorial case on 28 May, when the police attempted to exclude the katholikos from official ceremonies to commemorate the Armenians' 1918 battle against the Turks.

The Armenian Church had last year urged the government to carry through the battle against the Azeris over Nagorno Karabakh, from which the army was withdrawn to avoid an all-out war between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Now Pašinyan calls the bishops 'agents provocateurs' who want to lead to war again, but says that 'we will solve this problem in two or three months'. Recalling events of the distant past with regard to the Byzantines, in which the Church played a crucial role in military operations, he argues that 'this will not happen again today', with the Russians fomenting conflict by using the Church, as the patriarchs and emperors did in Byzantium.

The reinterpretation of history is a characteristic of the wars of the third millennium; while Putin in Russia seeks to re-establish the glories of the past, Pašinyan insists on proposing a new Armenia, one that is not an imitation of the ancient or medieval one, and the religious dimensions become decisive in assessing these prospects.

As the Armenian premier states, quoting passages from the letters of St Paul, 'I want to make a solemn statement: if the Church's relations with the government are bad, then the Church's relations with God will also be bad'.

Sections

Asia Today
Ecclesia in Asia
Indian Mandala
Red Lanterns
The Eastern Gate
The Russian world

See also

  • ​Seventeen centuries of history behind the political-religious crisis in Yerevan

    Katholikos Karekin II's opposition to Prime Minister Pašinyan's policy on agreements with Azerbaijan is only the latest chapter in a ‘rivalry’ that has its roots in the very origins of what was the world's first Christian state. And Karabakh, which the Church does not want to cede definitively, was a symbol of the defence of its identity during the years of Soviet domination.

  • A suspended peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan

    The Washington meeting confirmed the role of the US as mediator in place of Russia. Many issues remain to be resolved, including the international disputes between Yerevan and Baku, borders and prisoners. But the central issue is the opening of the so-called ‘Zangezur Corridor’, renamed the ‘Trump Corridor’ and under US control. The challenge for the Armenian Church.

  • Arrests and accusations of attempted coup: open conflict between the government and the Armenian Church

    Two archbishops (including Galstanyan) are in prison after a police raid on the patriarchate in Echmiadzin. Pashinyan directly accuses Catholicos Karekin II and calls for his removal, while the Armenian clergy responds by invoking the excommunication of the prime minister. According to the government, Moscow is behind the Church's ‘manoeuvres’, but other voices denounce the use of branding all opposition with ‘the stamp of Kremlin spies’. In the background are geopolitical balances and negotiations with Azerbaijan.

AsiaNews Weekly
News from Asia that matters

Subscribe to the newsletter to receive verified news, analysis and insights from Asian countries every week.

Subscribeto the newsletter
P.I.M.E. Centro Missionario
Agenzia Fides
P.I.M.E. Brasil
Radio Mondo
Mondo e Missione
P.I.M.E. U.S.A.
TV 2000