07/26/2016, 16.26
伊斯兰 – 法国
發送給朋友

萨米尔神父表示伊斯兰在法国和德国的恐怖行径是融合的危机更是政治危机

作者 Samir Khalil Samir

法国鲁昂司铎被绑架、杀害;德国威尔茨堡、慕尼黑、安斯巴赫的系列袭击都是很年轻的人、轻而易举便被洗脑的年轻人犯下的。德国是难民融合的典范。但是,伊斯兰激进势力无意让他们融合。并得到了沙特阿拉伯和卡塔尔的支持。但融合势在必行,还应说出的真相是:可兰经内有战争和暴力的内容。西方政客们的无知和道德沦丧

慕尼黑(亚洲新闻)—今天清晨,法国鲁昂总主教区附近的圣艾蒂安-迪鲁夫赖的雅克·阿梅尔神父惨遭两名身份不明歹徒割喉。后者还将正在参与弥撒圣祭的一位修女和几名教友扣为人质。现在,修女伤势严重正在抢救,其他伤员也有不同伤情。两名歹徒被闻讯赶来的法国军警打死了。法国总统奥德朗发表声明,指两名歹徒与伊斯兰国有联系,干脆称他们为“伊斯兰的战士”。法国穆斯林理事会严正谴责了这一“胆小鬼的野蛮”行径;呼吁全体法国人民团结起来。在梵蒂冈发表的声明中,教宗方济各“深感痛心”;“以最为激烈的方式严正谴责”攻击行径、“野蛮的凶杀”。

            近日发生在德国的系列屠杀和攻击事件以及今天法国所发生的,再一次令人质疑欧洲的穆斯林融合政策。但是,也特别突显了欧洲政治和政客们的迟钝,或许还有他们对伊斯兰的“无知”。说这话的是世界知名的权威伊斯兰专家、现罗马宗座东方学院教授、耶稣会士萨米尔·卡利尔神父。入夏以后,他前往德国工作。

Of the three major accidents to hit Germany (Würzburg, Munich, Ansbach), only one of these appears to be unrelated to the Islamic world, that of Munich. So far the police have not found any relationship between the young German-Iranian and Isis. In addition he was in psychological care. It was - it seems - an act of madness. His friend saved him, taking away a bag with 300 bullets. So far rthe police say there is no evidence of links with Islamism. In the case of the attacks in France (Rouen, Nice, Paris, etc ...) the link with IS is clear.

For the youth responsible for Wurzburg, who injured five people on a train, his ties to IS have been proven. As well as for the young man who blew himself up in Ansbach. The amazing thing is that they are all young; all people known not to be fanatical, or particularly religious; all from relatively tranquill backgrounds, without any particular problems. The youngman from Würzburg had been in a care home, but had stopped going there. In any case no one could have forseen such a dramatic development.

All three cases are surprising because they involve very young people who had no formation in any training camp; all of them went to school ... It is still unclear how they came into contact with Isis. Certainly not directly, but through the Internet, where violent proposals are visible in broad daylight.

So many attacks in a matter of a few days have created confusion in Germany, although the police has proven its efficiency, especially in Munich: they managed to take control of the situation really admirably.

In the case of Wurzburg, the young man was killed by a police officer. Some reproached him for having fired, but the interior minister has praised him.

They were all from peaceful backgrounds, neither poor, nor ideological. This is quite different from the case of Nice, where the bomber had calculated his attack in detail. He had even closed his account in the bank and sent 100 thousand Euros to his relatives (a gift to Isis?). Even his friends said the young Tunisian had it all planned.

In the Arab world it is said that Saudi Arabia and Qatar are really behind all of this Islamic terror. Early in its history, the fundamentalist movement was bent on destroying the Shiite in Iraq and Iran. Then it became a struggle against everyone.

The attacks on Germany have shocked everyone: the nation has received a million and more migrants and treats them fairly well. A refugee center near my home works very well: the children go to school, receive grants, adults can go to school German in the evening …

The sudden change demonstrated by these young people is unusual and quite new.

Now criticism is raining down on Angela Merkel, blamed for being overly generous in welcoming refugees. Perhaps the situation is changing: as long as they were a few thousand, integration was qualified. Now that the refugees have become hundreds of thousands, perhaps the integration program is beginning to crack.

Many Germans say it's a crisis in the integration project because the number of migrants is too great. I say though that in comparason with the rest of Europe, Germany was really a model in efforts to integrate immigrants.

And still the solution is integration, and not the rejection of migrants.

Unfortunately, Islam is hard to integrate because it has a culture in many ways that is the direct opposition to the current Western culture. Religiously, socially, of male-female relationships, in relation to eating ... it is a complete system. The fact it is a different religion is not a problem. But the fact that in Islam religion is tied to a political, social, cultural, historical, system, which affects everything, is: how one dresses, how one shakes hands, social relations ....

So many things make it difficult to assimilate the ideas of the West.

In the past, when there were North Africans who arrived in Europe, they were already a bit 'secularized, either because they had suffered the French colonization and the lifestyle imposed by their leaders (Tunisia and Algeria), or because they were Berbers, local ethnic groups who refused to be called "Arabs".

Today, however, the radical Islamist influence that proposes a different world in all aspects, makes integration much more difficult.

If the Islamist position is upheld (the Muslim Brotherhood, Salafis, etc ...) then integration is difficult. But if Muslims are more open, if they agree to learn from Western society, then it is possible. Once it was so: Western society was considered a model for development and emancipation. But today it is the opposite: for many Muslims Western society is to be rejected. And so they create a new model of Islam or Islamism (fundamentalist).

This is the great conflict of our era.

We also must have the courage to say that Islam has elements of violence in the Koran and the life of Muhammad. If we continue to say that "Islam is a religion of peace," we only create confusion and mystification.

Yesterday I listened to a speech by the British Prime Minister Theresa May, before she was prime minister - three years ago - when, in a meeting with Muslims she repeated a thousand times: "Islam is a religion of peace, Islam is a religion of peace ! There is not a single verse in the Koran that is violence!", to the enthusiastic applause of those present. All this is amazing: it is an attempt to minimize the problem. And this is done mainly by European political leaders, rather than by the people.

Why do they do this? To get the votes of Muslim communities. This is the case in France: for several years in France the government donated land for mosques and Islamic centers with free rent for 99 years. Thus France id being filled with mosques financed by countries that support terrorism. Among politicians there is a loss of moral sense, since they are willing to do anything to earn votes. And there's even a hint of ignorance: no one would say that in the Koran there are no violent verses! And the combination of ignorance and loss of a moral sense is explosive.

發送給朋友
以打印方式查看
CLOSE X
另见