09/28/2012, 00.00
中国
發送給朋友

薄熙来是中共的精英

作者 Bao Tong
今天,历经九个月的曲折前重庆市委书记薄熙来被开除出党。按照党的说法,薄氏因背离了党的理想被开除。但事实是,腐败、暴力、践踏人的权利、操纵群众是中共的基因。问题是中共的独裁从未接受过舆论的检验。只要不铲除独揽大权,新的薄熙来会不断涌现。鲍彤的反思

北京(亚洲新闻)-随着太子党薄熙来被开除出党及其移交司法机关依法处理,为中共领导层遭遇的最大丑闻画上了句号。

暴力、贪污、腐败、权力斗争,直至行凶杀人,先隐瞒后曝光,所有材料俱全。中共领导层在处理这起案件中十分小心谨慎:先判了薄三太子之妻,毒杀英国商人海伍德的薄谷开来死缓;再将薄氏前左膀右臂王立军判处十五年。直到今天,也就是海伍德被杀几乎一年之后,将一度是中国政坛明星的薄熙来开除出党。很奇怪的是,围绕着重庆的所有审判,始终只字不提重庆前市委书记、薄谷开来的丈夫薄熙来。

无论是海伍德帮助薄家打造金融帝国、搜刮巨额财富还是王立军打黑唱红等,薄熙来都脱不了干系。

自二OO九年以来,薄熙来在王立军的大力配合下在重庆上演了民粹政治、复辟毛泽东思想,大规模的打黑唱红,并动用了刑讯逼供等非常手段,逮捕了大批中共高官及亲属、富豪等。借此,薄熙来青云直上。截至到二月王立军出逃前,薄熙来在十八大入常几乎已成定局。

现在,他本人要接受审判了。因着他的被开除,中共试图重新挽回所剩无几的信誉,指其"极大损害了党和国家声誉,在国内外产生了非常恶劣的影响,给党和人民的事业造成了重大损失"。但鲍彤认为,薄熙来才是当之无愧的中共骄子。

他所做的一起恰恰是在中国不可辩驳的原则:一党专制。

只要没有民主,新的薄熙来会前仆后继、不断涌现。


 北京(亚洲新闻/Rfa - [. . .] Some say Bo Xilai is an unworthy son of the Chinese Communist Party. This is unfair. True, he displays some characteristics of lawlessness, but didn't Mao Zedong?

Lenin openly proclaimed that the revolution should depend on the direct action of the masses and not on any laws, opening up a whole new world of red terror. Mao Zedong wasn't ashamed of his own lawlessness; on the contrary, he relished it and reveled in it.

This is a message that the Chinese people know by heart. Bo Xilai is merely a good disciple of these ancestors. When it came to morals, Mao and Stalin weren't up to much. So we should judge Bo Xilai fairly. He isn't the unworthy son of the Party; he's the quintessential son of the Party, a chip off the old block.

When it comes to Party quality, no one can surpass Bo Xilai. To sing revolutionary songs is to follow the Party; to strike hard at organized crime is to engage the Party's designated enemies in a struggle to the death.

This is the highest form of revolution, and the toughest kind of discipline. At a personal level, Bo Xilai, under Mao Zedong's spell, engaged in a similar struggle to the death with his own father, whom Mao had designated a "traitor."

Who could compare with such innocent revolutionary spirit, such organizational zeal? It must be pointed out that Bo Xilai's use of "sing red, strike black" as the epitome of the Chongqing model shows that he was himself saturated with the essence of single-party dictatorship.

From the point of view of the Party's leaders, to sing revolutionary songs is to revere only the Party, and to go after organized crime is to crush dissent.

From the point of view of the people, the revolutionary song campaigns mean that they must follow the Party, and the anti-gang campaigns mean that they are willing to act as hit men for the Party. It is no exaggeration to say that where there are "sing red, strike black" campaigns, there you will have a single-party dictatorship, and where there are no "sing red, strike black" campaigns, you will have the death of that dictatorship.

Everything else comes second to this. While other issues may be important, they are not at the root of the system, and so they are not a matter of life and death.

To give an example, while you might find some relative merits and disadvantages between the policies of Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Stalin, or Hitler, they were all made in the service of a single-party dictatorship.

This is why, when it came to dividing up the cake or deciding how big to make it, and to a host of issues regarding public housing and the differences between an urban and a rural registration, Bo Xilai was very flexible.

He was able to take steps, within certain limits, to win people's hearts. But he had a very tight grasp on the principle: "Prosper with me, or die against me."

Even as he raised high the banner of "sing red, strike black," the knives were out in force, and his rule was domineering and uncompromising.

Why was this? This was the Bo Xilai model, or Bo Xilai-ism. It was also Mao Zedong Thought in 21st century garb. "Prosper with me, or die against me" isn't a new invention. It is the hideous face of an anti-humanist philosophy dressed up, as if by a miracle, as a sacred revolutionary truth, carried by Bo Xilai to its logical conclusion.

Some people argue that the truth is red, and that black means crime. Is that so? Since when were the nine black categories designated by law? The phrase "turn the country red" clearly marked out the territory for a calamity that had no historical precedent.

One can't run a country without a strong grasp of the concept of law. We don't need romanticism or snappy slogans. We mustn't perpetrate a fraud.

The peculiar quality of the revolutionary songs campaign is that it calls a deer a horse, poisons people's minds, and deifies the leaders. The seizure of political power without elections is spiritualized as "the great victory of the democratic revolution." Plunging the people into poverty and dispossession is immortalized as "the great and mighty victory of socialism."

The widening gulf between rich and poor is sermonized as "socialism with Chinese characteristics." Trampling on human rights is sanctified as "maintaining stability." Lawlessness is elevated to "glory."

Naturally, Bo Xilai himself is deified, at the same time, as the new messiah of the 21st century. The specific function of the "strike black" campaigns was to deal with problems that the law couldn't handle.

It had the ability to send people mad, so that they would strike wherever the Party told them: at rightists, at counterrevolutionaries, at liberalism, striking them all to death!

From the time that they are toddlers, the people are singing red and striking black, every day. They go crazy, while power at the highest level is being transmitted down through one, two, 1,000, or even 10,000 generations. The mighty work continues down the centuries, and a dynasty is established that rules the whole of China.

All of this is implied in that four-word incantation, that divine master plan, of Bo Xilai's: "sing red, strike black."

From very early on, all of this made some very highly placed people in the mainstream of Communist Party opinion very uneasy. Revolutionary songs are Party jargon.

When Lin Biao suggested that people read Mao's writings every day, the then propaganda minister, Lu Dingyi, didn't like it one bit.

He refuted Lin Biao by saying that the delicious taste of Yunnan ham would soon pall if people ate it every day. And when it came to propaganda, Lin Biao had nowhere near as much experience as Lu Dingyi.

Striking black every day is basically to have a cultural revolution every day. And when it came to a harmonious society, or maintaining stability, Bo Xilai had nowhere near as much experience as [President Hu Jintao].

Small wonder that, even during Bo's heyday of 2011, when the cries of the madding crowd for his accession to the throne rose ever higher, people of insight held on to the mainstream, refusing to make the pilgrimage [to Chongqing], to be copycats or to join the wild applause. Not bad! (Things were pretty complicated even for those who played along. There were very few who thrived only by singing red or concentrating on striking hard.)

Two choices lie before the 18th Party Congress: to throw in their lot with Bo Xilai or to cut him off completely. If they don't want to hold it under Bo's dark shadow, they could always start by quietly dropping the "sing red, strike black" campaigns.

Of course, it would be far more valuable, and far more deserving of people's warm welcome and determined support, if they were to openly and transparently cut their remaining ties with Bo Xilai.

 

 

 

 

TAGs
發送給朋友
以打印方式查看
CLOSE X
另见


“L’Asia: ecco il nostro comune compito per il terzo millennio!” - Giovanni Paolo II, da “Alzatevi, andiamo”