» 10/01/2008 12:52 VIETNAM Video cameras, surveillance, paid demonstrations to intimidate the archbishop of Hanoi by J.B. An Dang No one can enter or leave the archbishop's residence without being videotaped. The authorities are acting openly, with the clear objective of forcing Archbishop Kiet to resign. Another church raided.
Hanoi (AsiaNews) - Video cameras, telephone surveillance equipment, "spontaneous" demonstrations with insults and threats, another raid on a church. The Hanoi authorities are doing everything they can to intimidate Archbishop Joseph Ngo Quang Kiet, with the unconcealed objective of forcing his resignation or removal.
Video cameras and telephone surveillance equipment have been placed openly on the terrace of the Hoan Kiem elementary school (in the photo), to the right of the archbishop's residence, and on neighboring buildings. In practice, no one can enter or leave without being filmed, and the archbishop is essentially confined to his residence. Some appointments and celebrations have been rescheduled or canceled. Around the archbishop's residence, groups of elderly people are paid 20,000 dong (about 1.2 dollars) to pretend to be Catholic and shout at Archbishop Kiet to resign. The measures clearly have the purpose of intimidation.
The same objective was behind a raid carried out against the little church of Mac Thuong in Ly Nhan. Hundreds of thugs entered the building shouting obscenities and threatening the faithful, telling them their lives will not be easy as long as the archbishop remains at his post.
On another front, the president of the people's committee of the district of Hoan Kiem, Hoang Cong Khoi, has fined the archbishop 1,750,000 dong (about 105 dollars) for placing a statue of the Pietà inside the building of the former apostolic delegation. The statue has been confiscated. The vice chancellor of the diocese, Fr John Le Trong Cung, has protested against the fine, saying that "the nunciature and its land are not state properties. They are Church properties. Hanoi Catholics did nothing wrong when they placed the statue on the grounds of the building". He also calls the fine "unlawful, as it violates section four of the ordinance on belief and religion".