25 October 2016
AsiaNews.it Twitter AsiaNews.it Facebook
Geographic areas

  • > Africa
  • > Central Asia
  • > Europe
  • > Middle East
  • > Nord America
  • > North Asia
  • > South Asia
  • > South East Asia
  • > South West Asia
  • > Sud America
  • > East Asia
  •    - China
  •    - Hong Kong
  •    - Japan
  •    - Macau
  •    - North Korea
  •    - South Korea
  •    - Taiwan

  • mediazioni e arbitrati, risoluzione alternativa delle controversie e servizi di mediazione e arbitrato

    » 06/30/2007, 00.00


    Vatican to the conquest of a changing China

    For decades the diplomatic dialogue was non-existent; now there are signs of openness. As China experiences a religious renaissance, the regime’s various patriotic associations try to maintain their ideological and economic power over the Churches. Here is an analysis of the history of diplomatic relations between the Holy See and Beijing.
    Rome (AsiaNews) – Benedict XVI has been thinking about relations with China since the first days of his pontificate. A few weeks after his election in his first speech to the diplomatic corps on May 12, 2005, he also addressed “the nations with which the Holy See does not yet have diplomatic relations”. On that occasion he discussed possible diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic, not asking privileges for the Church, but “only the legitimate conditions of freedom to carry out her mission” combined with an “offer to cooperate, in her own province and with her own means, to safeguard the dignity of every person and to serve the common good.”
    In the announcement made a few months ago about the ‘Letter to Chinese Catholics,’ which was published today, the Vatican expressed its desire to further develop a “respectful and constructive dialogue with the governing authorities in order to overcome past difficulties” hoping that “a normalisation of relations on all levels would come to pass.”
    John Paul II held the same view and during the 27 years of his pontificate he devoted more than 30 speeches to the “great Chinese nation” and the Church in China, offering the Church’s dedication and service to society, asking only religious freedom in return (i.e. the right for the Church to appoint its own bishops).
    The death of the Polish Pope—“guilty” in Beijing’s eyes of causing the collapse of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe—has led to a new phase in the relations between China and the Holy See.
    In a number of highly discrete meetings between the Vatican and the Chinese Embassy in Italy an agreement was reached to allow some Chinese bishops to take part in the Synod on the Eucharist and to authorise the Sisters of Mother Teresa to open a home for the poor and the elderly in China. However, none of that happened. The four bishops invited to the synod were not allowed to leave the country. The sisters were officially invited but (so far) have not received any visa to come to China, to Qindao.
    It is undeniable that there is greater good will and openness in Beijing, so much so that in 2006, after a visit by a Vatican delegation to China, the government said it would end all unlawful bishop ordinations sponsored by the Patriotic Association, a policy that had irritated the Holy See which had called them “extremely grave acts, which offend the religious sentiments of each and every Catholic in China and the rest of the world [. . .] consequence of a vision of the Church that does not correspond with Catholic doctrine”.
    The new steps towards detente has one major obstacle, namely the Patriotic Association (PA), a government agency that has controlled the Catholic Church for the past 50 years and that still wants to establish a Christian community independent of the Vatican.
    As much as China has become a capitalist powerhouse in the last 20 years, the PA (and the Religious Affairs Ministry) has remained the stronghold of a diehard Stalinist faction that stifles every glimmer of hope for its own ideological and economic interests, managing and dilapidating Church property for private use.
    Of course, the Vatican is no longer condemned “as the running dog of Western capitalism” as it was in the 1950s. Even in official (i.e. government-sanctioned) churches prayers are said for the Pope during mass, but on issues like the appointment of bishops and the management of Church property, the PA remains intransigent.
    For this reason, whilst some party insiders over the past few years have called for greater religious freedom, the PA has done everything in its power to block any rapprochement between China and the Vatican. This happened in 2006 with the unlawful bishop appointments; it happened in 2000 with the campaign against the canonisation of Chinese martyrs, the (unlawful) ordination of seven bishops and the arrest of underground bishops and priests.
    Never the less, the PA is increasingly encountering resistance in bishops and believers. Following the Cultural Revolution, when official and underground bishops found themselves in the same camps as a result of the same persecution, and after the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, which destroyed the Communist Party’s credibility, more and more government-appointed bishops have secretly sought reconciliation with the Pope.
    Now thanks to John Paul It’s magnanimity it is fair to say that official and underground Churches are one but in name.
    Increasingly, the larceny and violence visited upon the Church is being resisted by a growing number of nuns, priests and bishops who demonstrate, write, and file charges against the PA and party members whose corruption is undermining Hu Junta’s much loved idea of “harmonious society.”
    The last rear-guard battle by the PA and the party (or segments thereof) is to charge the Vatican with having relations with Taiwan. For decades China has insisted that any diplomatic dialogue with the Holy See had to meet two “pre-conditions”: not to use religion to interfere in the domestic affairs of China and break off relations with Taiwan.
    That breaking relations with Taiwan was but an unrelated pretext became evident in 1999 when the then Secretary of State, Cardinal Sodano, said publicly that the Vatican Embassy in Taipei was in fact the embassy in Beijing and that he was prepared to move it back to the mainland, “not tomorrow but tonight.”
    If the diplomatic mission is not in Beijing the responsibility lies with Mao Zedong who refused the presence of the Vatican nuncio, Mgr Antonio Riberi, in the newly-established People’s Republic and expelled him in 1951. Only in 1952 did Archbishop Riberi reluctantly move to Taiwan after many evasive signals and much silence from Beijing.
    The other “pre-condition” is the real obstacle. For party ideologues “non-interference” means the right to appoint bishops and PA activities.
    The future of diplomatic relations will depend on how China defines religious freedom. As late 1982 a secret party document indicated that it was still bent on destroying religion and create its own Church independent from Rome.
    In 1999 when there were signs that diplomatic talks might start up again, another secret party paper said that underground bishops and priests had to be forced to submit to the PA and obey it on pain of jail or isolation.
    Hu Jintao’s pragmatism and that of his faction is one factor that favours improved relations. China’s current leadership wants in fact to modernise China and improve its image in the world ahead of next year’s Olympics. Establishing relations with the Vatican would cap China’s final acceptance on the world stage.
    By contrast, the state of anarchy and corruption that reign inside the party pushes in the opposite direction. Many party members are trying to personally profit from the mainland’s uncontrolled economic development, trying to preserve privileges and control.
    But then again, Chinese society has changed. Unrest is growing and hundreds of demonstrations are taking place every day as people can no longer stand corruption in China’s provinces. Similarly, instead of withering away as some kind of “opium of the masses,” religion is gaining ground even among disillusioned party members. Under the circumstances perhaps religion might even save China from breakdown and collapse.
    e-mail this to a friend Printable version

    See also

    20/12/2008 CHINA - VATICAN
    Beijing, Vatican must break with Taiwan and not interfere in domestic affairs
    Celebration of the 50th anniversary of the autonomy of the Chinese church in the area of the appointment and ordination of bishops. Patriotic bishop Ma Yinglin, ordained without the approval of the Holy See, also present. Hopes for dialogue with the Vatican may be vanishing.

    25/07/2007 CHINA
    The Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association celebrates 50 years at a less than ideal moment
    Founded on August 2, 1957, the association is less and less able to serve its original purpose, namely to manage the Catholic community on behalf of the government. Some 5,000 invited guests are expected for the celebrations but many will be absent.

    21/06/2016 17:27:00 CHINA - VATICAN
    Vatican silence over Shanghai’s Mgr Ma Daqin causing confusion and controversy

    For some, Mgr Ma’s blog post praising the Patriotic Association and acknowledging his mistakes is nothing but “dirt”. For others, he chose humiliation for the “sake of his diocese”. Many wonder why the Holy See has remained silent about the article’s content and the bishop’s persecution. Some suspect the Vatican views the episode in positive terms. Yet, the Ma Daqin affair raises a major question. Has Benedict XVI’s Letter to Chinese Catholics (which describes the Patriotic Association as “incompatible with Catholic doctrine”) been abolished? If it has, who did it? A journey of compromises without truth is full of risks.

    21/10/2010 CHINA - VATICAN
    Card. Zen’s visit to Shanghai may be a trap set by Beijing
    According to some commentators, on his visit to Shanghai the, cardinal advised the local bishop to attend the meeting of Catholic representatives, a body that the pope considers "incompatible with Catholic faith." The Cardinal responds.

    24/07/2007 CHINA – VATICAN
    Cardinal Zen warns against confusion surrounding the Pope’s letter to Chinese Catholics
    The bishop of Hong Kong contradicts some of the claims made by sinologist Father Heyndrickx who suggests that the papal document encourages members of the underground Church to come out into the open, ask for recognition by civil authorities and concelebrate services with officials from the official Church.

    Editor's choices

    The new bishop of Changzhi and the many voices on China-Vatican dialogue

    Bernardo Cervellera

    The ordination will take place on November 10 in the Cathedral. The bishop had been appointed by the Holy See at least two years ago. But he was waiting for the green light from Beijing. Similar situation in Chengdu. Fears for the presence of excommunicated bishops. Reconciliation between illegitimate and official bishops is not brought about by political gestures, but depends on personal and canonical procedures. A meeting between the Chinese delegation and the Vatican is not "imminent".


    Pope: the cruelty of those who kill children in Iraq “makes us weep”

    "Our hearts are shocked by the heinous acts of violence that have been committed for far too long against innocent citizens, be they Muslim, Christian or members of other ethnic groups and religions."  World Mission Day “is time of courage”.


    AsiaNews monthly magazine (in Italian) is free.


    News feed

    Canale RSScanale RSS 

    Add to Google


    IRAN 2016 Banner

    2003 © All rights reserved - AsiaNews C.F. e P.Iva: 00889190153 - GLACOM®