09/21/2022, 18.43
INDIA
Send to a friend

Hindu nationalists justify Hijab school ban pointing to protests in Iran

by Nirmala Carvalho

Appearing before India’s Supreme Court, a senior Indian government official cited ongoing protests in Iran over Mahsa Amini’s death as evidence that the hijab is “not essential”, that to protect India’s secularism, it should not be worn with school uniforms. Some 2,000 intellectuals sign a letter against the ban, which they deem “a hate crime”.

 

New Delhi (AsiaNews) – During a hearing in the Supreme Court of India over a hijab ban in schools, a senior Indian government official defended the prohibition citing ongoing protests in Iran following the death of Mahsa Amini, a young woman who died from injuries inflicted by Iran’s “morality police” because she did not wear the hijab correctly

Acting on behalf of the State of Karnataka, Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta defended the ban. This follows an appeal by a group of Islamic associations to the country’s highest court after the High Court of Karnataka last March upheld the ban on female students wearing the hijab, arguing that it is incompatible with the school uniform.

The issue has sparked protests and exacerbated tensions with the Muslim community in one of the states of India ruled by Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

Solicitor General Mehta argued that India is a secular country and that even in constitutionally Islamic countries such as Iran, not all women wear the hijab, indeed, many are fighting against it. He added that according to the Qur'an itself, the hijab “it is permissible, not essential”.

For its part, the Supreme Court noted that it must be “proved beyond doubt that the wearing of the hijab was a threat to public order, public health or morality”.

During the hearing, Mr Mehta slammed the Popular Front of India (PFI), alleging that the protest “movement was designed to create agitation", using social media to urge women to wear the hijab.

For the solicitor general, had the state government not acted the way it did, it would have been "guilty of dereliction of constitutional duty”.

Several appeals have been filed with the Supreme Court against the High Court's ruling that wearing the hijab is not part of the essential religious practices protected by Article 25 of the Indian Constitution.

In February, in the wake of the controversy over the ban in Karnataka, some 2,000 intellectuals penned an open letter in solidarity with Muslim schoolgirls.

“The ban on hijab in classrooms and campuses in coastal Karnataka, which is now spreading to other states, is a hate crime," their letter reads.

The “Uniform in such institutions is meant to minimise the differences between students. They are not intended to impose cultural uniformity on a plural country,” it added.

Send to a friend
Printable version
CLOSE X
See also
Navalny on trial again as ‘Putin’s terror’ continues
06/02/2021 12:57
Campaign in favour of Christian Dalits meets first success
21/07/2005
Civil society leaders against lynching and Hindutva extremism
09/10/2019 16:32
"We are optimistic," says Paul Bhatti as Rimsha Masih's bail hearing postponed to Friday
03/09/2012
Letter by 138 Muslim intellectuals calls on Muslims to reflect upon their faith, says Muslim scholar
23/01/2008


Newsletter

Subscribe to Asia News updates or change your preferences

Subscribe now
“L’Asia: ecco il nostro comune compito per il terzo millennio!” - Giovanni Paolo II, da “Alzatevi, andiamo”